The peer review process is a system that is used to determine the quality of a manuscript before the piece gets published. This process relies on researchers and experts in the relevant research area of the manuscript, and they are expected to assess the manuscript based on originality, validity, relevance, and significance. This helps editors decide whether they should go through with publishing the manuscript in their journal. As researchers value having their work published in notable journals in their field, it is important to understand the many processes that occur behind the scenes in order to ensure that the manuscript has the best chance of becoming published.
Peer review and publication are not easy tasks. They are often frustrating and time-consuming. It is common for it to take a year from a manuscript’s submission to the time it is published. The process is also known to be competitive, as there are many researchers out there who want to get their work noticed and disseminated. For highly competitive journals, such as Science, the acceptance rate is often less than 8% of the articles received. The New England Journal of Medicine, another prestigious journal, is known to publish just 6% of the submissions received. However, scholars and researchers often want their work shared and published in competitive journals that are read by many in the field (University of California-Berkeley, 2022).
(Read more about academic publishing here!)
With the fact that researchers can improve their chances of getting accepted into a journal if they understand the many nuances of the peer review process, we can delve into the facets of peer reviewing. The process starts when a manuscript is submitted to a journal. First, the manuscript gets assessed in order to see if it fits within the journal’s submission guidelines. If the manuscript is found to be relevant to the journal’s aim and scope, the editorial team will select potential peer reviewers who have expertise in the field that is the main focus of the manuscript. These peer reviewers are selected with the intent to review manuscript to the best of their abilities and produce recommendations based on their reading of the manuscript (BioMed Central, n.d.).
There are four main kinds of peer review that are commonly used by journal editors. These are single-blind, double-blind, open peer, and transparent peer. Single-blind refers to when reviewers know the names of the authors of the manuscript, but the authors do not know who the reviewers are, unless a reviewer decides to sign the report. On the other hand, in double-blind peer review, the reviewers do not know the names of the authors, and the authors also do not know the names of the reviewers of their manuscript (BioMed Central, n.d.).
(Do’s and Don'ts of the Peer Review Process )
The other two kinds of peer review models are a little bit more complicated. In open peer, the authors are aware of who their reviewers are, and the reviewers also know who the authors are. If the manuscript is reviewed and ends up being accepted by the editors, the named reviewer reports are published along with the article and the authors’ response to the reviewer(s). In the case of a transparent peer, the reviewers know the names of the authors, but similar to single-blind, the authors would not know who the reviewers are unless they choose to sign the review report. The main difference between transparent peer and single-blind is that when published, the transparent peer reviewed manuscript will be published with anonymous review reports and the authors’ response to the reviewer(s), while this is not the case for single-blind (BioMed Central, n.d.).
As publishing is an important pillar of building a standout research profile, it is paramount to make use of available editorial services, many of which are available on the eContent Pro website. Services such as English Language Copyediting, Scientific and Scholarly Copyediting, Journal Selection, and many other related services will greatly improve your chances of getting your manuscript accepted into a journal. You will find eContent Pro’s editorial services to be top quality, turned around exceptionally quickly, and affordably priced. Here are what our satisfied customers are saying about eContent Pro’s Author Services:
“The copy editing was very thorough and was completed in a very timely manner”
Dr. Melodie Carr-Winston, Lindenwood University, USA
“This is my first time to edit the document at eContent Pro and I was very satisfied with the service. They are always ready to kindly answer my questions.”
Diah Widhiningsih, S.P., M.Sc., Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia
- BioMed Central. (n.d.). Peer review process. BMC. https://www.biomedcentral.com/getpublished/peer-review-process
- University of California-Berkeley. (2022, Sept. 9). Scrutinizing science: Peer review. Understanding Science 101. https://undsci.berkeley.edu/understanding-science-101/how-science-works/scrutinizing-science-peer-review/